| Skip Main Content and go to Footer Contents. DWF: The Best File Format for Published Design Information Finding the Ideal Medium for Lifecycle Management Building and infrastructure construction, and product design and manufacturing are all intrinsically collaborative processes. From conception and design on through to project completion and ongoing maintenance, all points in the lifecycle of any building, product, or infrastructure element involve the work of fluctuating teams of designers, engineers, developers, clients, and contractors. Even as the Internet-based project-collaboration tools have made it easier to manage large-scale projects, the collaborative nature of the group endeavor remains unchanged. Recent studies tell us that for each design creator there are on average 10 consumers of that design information within an extended team, both inside and outside the enterprise. Distributing design information to these team members, and soliciting feedback, has long been a major cost in building construction, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects. The Internet, project collaboration tools, and email have done much in this area by making it possible for architects, cartographers, and engineers to distribute CAD model data to other designers nearly instantaneously anywhere around the world. But while physical barriers to communication among the design profession have been effectively removed, what hasn't changed is the inability of designers to share the full scope of their published work securely, efficiently, and accurately with colleagues, clients, and partners outside the design profession. Moving Away from Paper The cost of working with paper adds up to millions of dollars in losses every year within building construction, infrastructure, development and manufacturing. Delays involved in physically distributing designs, the difficulty of keeping distributed workers up to date, and the inability to track feedback on paper often result in costly mistakes. Secondary and directly measurable costs for creating and delivering printed designs also remain. Replacing paper-based processes with electronic processes utilising standard CAD or GIS authoring software often leads to challenges both from a technological sense and in terms of cost/time. In the first instance, it is not practical for professionals who are not CAD users/ designers to purchase, learn, and use sophisticated design applications such as AutoCAD®, Autodesk Inventor®, Autodesk Map® 3D 2005 or Autodesk® Revit®. In the second instance, while paper plans can be printed and sent to dispersed team members, the process is time-consuming, inefficient, and not easily tracked. On a typical large construction project, for example, costs associated with courier services like FedEx can easily reach as high as $500,000. Moreover, any input or changes made to printed designs have to be physically sent back to the designer who then must compile, resolve, and reconcile the various versions. Errors are often introduced when document markups are missed. From a cycle-time standpoint, the traditional paper publish-distribute-markup-return-revise-republish process involves a four-day turnaround or longer. An alternative method that has been gaining popularity in recent years is for designers to recreate the current paper process in an electronic form using formats such as TIFF, JPEG, CALS, HPGL, and PDF. The drawback is that these electronic paper formats can't capture the intelligence within a design, and don't resolve the costly process issues of tracking, workflow, and accountability. Because they are capable only of presenting 2D images of what are actually complex 3D models, electronic paper formats lack the attributes necessary to serve as an effective medium for sharing design information. A new standard has emerged, however, that combines the convenience of electronic paper with the rich viewing, tracking, querying, plotting, printing, workflow, and security capabilities demanded by designers. Known as DWF™ (Design Web Format™), this file type was specifically developed by Autodesk as a medium for architects, engineers, and GIS professionals to quickly capture and securely distribute rich design data anywhere it is needed—both within the design profession and beyond. DWF, from the beginning, has been an open standard, providing the specifications and technology for any vendor to develop applications that utilise DWF. Intelligence You Can See The open, compact, and secure DWF file format enables the efficient distribution of rich design data to anyone who needs it. DWF protects the integrity of the designs, and allows for the precise publishing, rendering and printing of even the most complex 3D designs and models. In fact, unlike paper-centric file formats, DWF can convey the rich design intent of the original CAD model, thereby ensuring that the user is receiving exactly what the author intended. As a format that's ready for viewing, printing, plotting, or placing in a web page, DWF also has distinct advantages over traditional paper-based documents. By using DWF files instead of paper-based designs, firms can reduce or eliminate many of the hard costs associated with communicating and sharing design data: courier and mailing services; the labor needed to print, organise, sort, and store large document sets; and materials such as paper and ink. More importantly, the DWF format reduces the time it takes to manage the design creation and review processes. Consider its principal attributes:
In addition, when an extended team needs to provide input on a design, Autodesk® DWF™ Composer software provides a complete set of review tools that enable users to contribute comments and ideas to DWF files without altering the original data. This high-performance review, markup, measure, printing, and plotting application for digital design data makes it easy for entire teams to work with designs. Familiarity with the originating design application is not necessary, and learning to use DWF Composer is quick and easy for everyone, from construction supervisors and senior executives to engineers and contractors. For team members who simply need to view or print DWF files, the Autodesk DWF Viewer is a free, downloadable application that provides the same rich visual and print fidelity as Autodesk's advanced design applications. Unlike alternatives such as Adobe® Acrobat® or SolidWorks eDrawings, DWF Viewer is a high-fidelity and high-performance viewer for sharing 2D and 3D drawings, maps and models. Clearly, with its ability to accurately capture rich digital design data in a compact, open, secure, and readily transmittable format, DWF—in concert with the Autodesk DWF Viewer and DWF Composer—is the ideal solution for sharing design information. A Matter of Specialisation: The Advantages of DWF over PDF for the Design Team Increasingly, designers and project managers are concluding that using printed plans and delivery services to get team input during the design process is simply too expensive and time-consuming. Since many project teams today are already set up on collaboration sites, or are connected via basic email and web access, most architects, contractors, engineers, suppliers, and vendors can be reached whenever and wherever they may be. The question now is how to distribute designs to everyone in a format that will allow them to see and understand the true intent of the designer. Actual working design files (DWG format) created with an AutoCAD software program can be impractical for a variety of reasons. Security of the designer's intellectual property is a concern with DWG because anyone with the AutoCAD application can edit the file or steal the design. Moreover, paying for everyone on the team to install and then learn to use a sophisticated CAD or mapping application itself would be costly. So, for many in the building, product design, and mapping industries, the choice for a standard design collaboration/management format has been narrowed down to two possibilities: DWF or PDF. Let's consider each format's features and capabilities. File Format Features and Capabilities
Looking at DWF versus PDF file formats there are some commonalities between the two. Both formats produce self-contained files; support multiple pages, printing, and password protection; and have raster and vector graphic support. With the purchase of Acrobat 6 Professional, users can publish files from AutoCAD; preserve CAD layers; and perform redlines/comments as they can with DWF. However, PDF falls short compared to DWF in terms of a number of key capabilities for the design industry. While DWF was designed specifically for sharing rich design data, PDF was designed for textual-based document exchange. Today, Autodesk provides a better format for distributing and sharing engineering design data with DWF. DWF provides
DWF: Meeting the Unique Needs of Design Teams As the analysis above shows, DWF has clear advantages over PDF. In fact, in the areas that are most crucial for accurately conveying rich design information—view and print fidelity, compression, and scalability for design data, and design intelligence including 3D—PDF falls short. Without these critical functions, the PDF format is not optimised for designers to leverage all the capabilities of CAD applications. And in the larger picture, PDF prevents designers from sharing the full intent of their work with the extended team. DWF, on the other hand, is specifically designed to meet the unique needs and demands of the design profession, and to facilitate the sharing of design information with extended teams. As an evolutionary enhancement to current processes, DWF requires little, if any, learning curve and no investment in new publishing applications. Moreover, by leveraging the model information, object properties, automatic hyperlinks, and other details that give CAD designs their depth and complexity, DWF enables all members of the extended team to understand the intent of the CAD designer. The clear advantages of DWF over PDF include
The Viewing Applications Autodesk DWF Viewer vs. Adobe Reader Just as the DWF file format has many advantages over the PDF format, so does the Autodesk DWF Viewer provide more benefits to design teams than does Adobe® Reader®. Both are simple, free applications that allow users to view and print their respective "published" formats, but there the similarities end. Autodesk DWF Viewer uses the same printing and rendering engines as Autodesk design products. DWF Viewer provides full visual and print fidelity for designs and drawings and easier navigation tools and enables users to print to original scale or specified scale. Not so with Adobe Reader. Moreover, while it is relatively easy for an AutoCAD user to create a PDF and quickly distribute it, much of the detail of the original file will be lost when published to PDF and viewed in Adobe Reader. Autodesk DWF Viewer, on the other hand, provides easy access to information-rich 2D and 3D design data to anyone who needs it. DWF Viewer includes the complex information embedded in design files, including detailed information about each sheet within the DWF file and access to object properties published from applications like Autodesk® Architectural Desktop and Autodesk Map 3D. Put simply, the depth and scope that are essential to accurate engineering and architectural designs simply cannot be rendered in the Adobe Reader. The Reviewing Applications Autodesk DWF Composer vs. Adobe Acrobat Professional The same issues of designer intent and viewing/printing integrity also hold true in the case of the reviewing applications of Autodesk and Adobe, Autodesk DWF Composer versus Acrobat 6.0 Professional. Created to help speed the document review process, Acrobat 6.0 Professional offers similar redlining tools and pan and zoom capabilities featured in DWF Composer. Yet Acrobat Professional was built as a general application to serve the needs of business executives, creative professionals, and administrative staff across a range of industries. As such, it not only lacks the key plotting and visual rendering elements of DWF Composer and DWF Viewer, but it also lacks the specialised attributes that are vital to efficient design collaboration in the construction, mapping, engineering, and manufacturing sectors. When redlining, marking-up, measuring, plotting, printing, or even creating new DWF files, Autodesk users are assured of the highest fidelity. What's more, Autodesk users get the same viewing capabilities as the software that the design was created in—with dynamic pan, zoom, and 3D orbit. Team members can measure design elements right from the data and be assured of accuracy. The markup and revision processes are also dramatically improved with Autodesk DWF Composer. Users can create smart markups with tools that snap to the underlying objects, easing the speed of design reviews. More importantly, any markups made in DWF Composer can be brought back into the AutoCAD 2005 family of products, for the complete round-tripping of markups, annotations, and other changes back into the original application, streamlining the design review process. DWF Composer also supports advanced sheet set organisation and workflow capabilities, allowing users to fully control the design review process with the team. Redlines and markup are saved back into a DWF file, along with detailed information including author, status, history, and remarks for each annotation. The designer can review markups directly within AutoCAD to determine how best to modify the original drawing. For a more-detailed comparison between viewers, please see the Viewer Comparison Matrix available online at http://south-apac.autodesk.com/viewercomparison. Total Cost of Ownership Because the Autodesk and Adobe solution sets share many attributes—free downloadable viewer applications, for instance—it would seem at first glance that there would be little difference in the value they deliver over time. A closer look, however, reveals significant differences. First, the file formats. As mentioned above, PDF files and DWF files created from the same design file are not even close in size: DWFs are on average less than one-third the size of PDFs. Considering that a large construction project can easily generate 150,000 documents, the much larger sizes of PDFs are likely to require added storage capacity, bandwidth, and system resources, inevitably resulting in greater costs. Also, DWF publishing is a native feature of all Autodesk design applications and is free to non-Autodesk applications with the Autodesk DWF Writer, a downloadable application available at http://south-apac.autodesk.com/dwfwriter. To create PDFs from an Autodesk publishing application, however, the user must purchase Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional. Also, it must be added that the DWF Composer reviewing tool is far less expensive than Acrobat Professional and is fully integrated with the AutoCAD 2005 family of products. Lastly, it is important to note that Autodesk provides a fully open specification and technology solution, providing the ability for users to develop applications to read, write, create, view, query, and print DWF files. Autodesk is committed to making these developer tools accessible to customers and partners. Summary A feature-by-feature comparison of the DWF and PDF file formats, along with the Autodesk and Adobe viewing and reviewing applications, shows that only the Autodesk offering provides unique capabilities and advantages to building, mapping, and product design project teams. Only with DWF can designers capture and securely communicate the full extent of their work with colleagues inside and outside the enterprise. DWF files are smaller and require fewer resources to transmit, review, and store. Users of Autodesk design applications do not need to invest in any other application in order to create DWF files. The viewing application, printing engine, and reviewing tool for the DWF format are better equipped for the specific needs of the building and engineering industries because they allow for the viewing, markup, and printing of both 2D and 3D drawings, maps, and models. With regard to total cost of ownership, the Autodesk solution set is far less expensive than the alternative. In short, the DWF file format is the ideal medium for packaging, delivering, and collaborating on intelligent design information. *This product is subject to the terms and conditions of the end-user license agreement that accompanies download of this software. |
